Luckily, (and perhaps a bit guiltily) the chemise I made for the Victorian Undergarments class for HSF #4. I used white combed cotton lawn that I bought at Dharma Trading Company and it was a joy to work with.. and wear. One pre-washing made the chemise feel like the softest, comfiest in garment in my historical closet. The pattern, TV102, wasn't difficult, but me being me, I had to make it more time consuming by fussing with the trimming. But I'm glad I did. I think the three tucks really add something, as does the ribbon on the hem. (Although I was cursing when I did it because threading the ribbon thru the eyelet took the better part of an evening)
I had an astoundingly difficult time finding grosgrain ribbon for this. I went to 4 different fabric stores locally, ideally looking for a pale blue or lavender. They had a few neon colours and white. I couldn't even find black. I wasn't thrilled about the poly but with as difficult as it was to find any grosgrain, I decided to get the while poly grosgrain and learn to like it,
The finished chemise
I do think if/when I make the pattern again, I will probably narrow the sleeve a bit. It seemed wide to me to begin with and adding the lace with such a soft drapey fabric made the sleeve stick out more than I cared for. One of my classmates said she used the sleeve from TV105 instead. I may try that or just skip the sleeves altogether. I did really like the effect of the eyelet insertion drawstring, though.
Sleeve and eyelet insertion drawstring
Tucks and eyelet on the hem (photobomb by Samuel L Catson)
The Challenge: #4 Under It All
Fabric: Combed cotton lawn
Pattern: TV102
Year: 1885
Notions: cotton eyelet, cotton lace, poly grosgrain ribbon
How Historically accurate is it? 80%? Points off for the poly grosgrain and machine sewing a bit more than our average Victorian seamstress probably would have
Hours to complete: 6-8 (I am a slow fussy sewist)
First Worn: Probably to 221BCon in April
Total Cost: $40? (I intentionally bought extra on the fabrics and trims to add them to the stash)
No comments:
Post a Comment